{"cadastre":{"ACT":{"addresses":"held","buildings":false,"licence":"CC-BY-4.0","licence_confidence":"confirmed","may_publish":true,"name":"Australian Capital Territory","parcels":"held","why":null},"NSW":{"addresses":"held","buildings":false,"licence":"CC-BY-3.0-AU","licence_confidence":"confirmed","may_publish":true,"name":"New South Wales","parcels":"held","why":null},"NT":{"addresses":"held","buildings":false,"licence":null,"licence_confidence":"unresolved","may_publish":false,"name":"Northern Territory","parcels":"absent","why":"no licence stated - 'not specified' means no permission granted, not public domain"},"QLD":{"addresses":"held","buildings":true,"licence":"CC-BY-4.0","licence_confidence":"confirmed","may_publish":true,"name":"Queensland","parcels":"held","why":null},"SA":{"addresses":"held","buildings":false,"licence":null,"licence_confidence":"confirmed","may_publish":false,"name":"South Australia","parcels":"brokered","why":"no licence stated - 'not specified' means no permission granted, not public domain"},"TAS":{"addresses":"held","buildings":false,"licence":"CC-BY-3.0-AU","licence_confidence":"confirmed","may_publish":true,"name":"Tasmania","parcels":"held","why":null},"VIC":{"addresses":"held","buildings":false,"licence":"CC-BY-4.0","licence_confidence":"confirmed","may_publish":true,"name":"Victoria","parcels":"held","why":null},"WA":{"addresses":"held","buildings":false,"licence":null,"licence_confidence":"confirmed","may_publish":false,"name":"Western Australia","parcels":"brokered","why":"no licence stated - 'not specified' means no permission granted, not public domain"}},"classes":[{"group":"planning","id":"zoning","title":"Planning zone"},{"group":"planning","id":"fsr","title":"Maximum floor space ratio"},{"group":"planning","id":"hob","title":"Maximum building height"},{"group":"planning","id":"lot_size","title":"Minimum lot size"},{"group":"planning","id":"tod","title":"Transport Oriented Development area"},{"group":"planning","id":"dual_occ_prohibited","title":"Dual occupancy prohibited by LEP map"},{"group":"planning","id":"dual_occ_restricted","title":"Dual occupancy restriction area"},{"group":"planning","id":"dual_occ_lot_size","title":"Minimum lot size for dual occupancy"},{"group":"education","id":"school_catchment","title":"Government school zone"},{"group":"hazard","id":"wind_region","title":"Wind region"},{"group":"hazard","id":"aircraft_noise","title":"Aircraft noise"},{"group":"hazard","id":"bushfire","title":"Bushfire prone area"},{"group":"hazard","id":"flood","title":"Flood planning area"},{"group":"heritage","id":"heritage","title":"Heritage listing"},{"group":"hazard","id":"landslide","title":"Landslide risk area"},{"group":"hazard","id":"coastal","title":"Coastal erosion area"},{"group":"hazard","id":"acid_sulfate","title":"Acid sulfate soils"},{"group":"heritage","id":"aboriginal_heritage","title":"Aboriginal cultural heritage"}],"layers":{"ACT":{"aboriginal_heritage":{"sources":["act_heritage"],"status":"brokered"},"acid_sulfate":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"A construction and excavation constraint on low-lying coastal land. Answered for Victoria, New South Wales, Brisbane, Logan and Moreton Bay."},"aircraft_noise":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"There is no national aircraft-noise layer. An ANEF is produced for one airport by that airport's operator, endorsed by Airservices Australia, and published as a chart in the airport's master plan; it reaches GIS only when a council writes it into its planning scheme, one council at a time and at whatever vintage that scheme was last amended. Airservices' own ANEI/ANEF data product is flight-track and noise-monitor time series delivered by email on subscription, not contours and not a service. Brisbane publishes contours for Brisbane and Archerfield airports but attaches a purpose restriction this service cannot meet - see the note under Queensland. No aircraft noise layer is held, so this is not checked anywhere; the Airport Noise section gives the distance to the nearest aerodrome and says that noise and obstacle limitation surfaces were not assessed."},"bushfire":{"sources":["act_bushfire"],"status":"brokered"},"coastal":{"sources":[],"status":"not_applicable","why":"The Australian Capital Territory is landlocked. Coastal erosion-prone areas are declared under state coastal legislation over land facing the sea, and there is none here, so this is not a question about land in the ACT."},"dual_occ_lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP maps it publish this, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_prohibited":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_restricted":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"flood":{"sources":["act_flood"],"status":"brokered"},"fsr":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. Other states set floor area differently or do not publish it as a map."},"heritage":{"sources":["act_heritage"],"status":"brokered"},"hob":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure."},"landslide":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by some councils as a planning overlay and by no state uniformly. Answered for Victoria, New South Wales, Tasmania, Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Logan and Moreton Bay."},"lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure; hectare values are shown in square metres."},"school_catchment":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Government school intake zones are published for New South Wales and Victoria and for nowhere else: Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory each run a school-finder tool over boundaries they do not release as data. Non-government schools set their own enrolment areas and publish none of them anywhere."},"tod":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by the Housing SEPP 2021 for New South Wales only."},"wind_region":{"sources":["ga_wind_region"],"status":"held"},"zoning":{"sources":["act_zoning"],"status":"held"}},"NSW":{"aboriginal_heritage":{"sources":["nsw_aboriginal_significance","nsw_heritage"],"status":"brokered"},"acid_sulfate":{"sources":["nsw_acid_sulfate"],"status":"brokered"},"aircraft_noise":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"There is no national aircraft-noise layer. An ANEF is produced for one airport by that airport's operator, endorsed by Airservices Australia, and published as a chart in the airport's master plan; it reaches GIS only when a council writes it into its planning scheme, one council at a time and at whatever vintage that scheme was last amended. Airservices' own ANEI/ANEF data product is flight-track and noise-monitor time series delivered by email on subscription, not contours and not a service. Brisbane publishes contours for Brisbane and Archerfield airports but attaches a purpose restriction this service cannot meet - see the note under Queensland. No aircraft noise layer is held, so this is not checked anywhere; the Airport Noise section gives the distance to the nearest aerodrome and says that noise and obstacle limitation surfaces were not assessed."},"bushfire":{"sources":["nsw_bushfire"],"status":"brokered"},"coastal":{"sources":["nsw_coastal"],"status":"brokered"},"dual_occ_lot_size":{"sources":["nsw_dual_occ_lot_size","nsw_dual_occ_lot_size_b"],"status":"held"},"dual_occ_prohibited":{"sources":["nsw_dual_occ_prohibited"],"status":"held"},"dual_occ_restricted":{"sources":["nsw_dual_occ_restricted"],"status":"held"},"flood":{"sources":["nsw_flood"],"status":"brokered"},"fsr":{"sources":["nsw_fsr"],"status":"held"},"heritage":{"sources":["nsw_heritage","nsw_state_heritage"],"status":"brokered"},"hob":{"sources":["nsw_hob"],"status":"held"},"landslide":{"sources":["nsw_landslide"],"status":"brokered"},"lot_size":{"sources":["nsw_lot_size"],"status":"held"},"school_catchment":{"sources":["nsw_school_catchment"],"status":"held"},"tod":{"sources":["nsw_tod_accelerated","nsw_tod_sites"],"status":"held"},"wind_region":{"sources":["ga_wind_region"],"status":"held"},"zoning":{"sources":["nsw_zoning"],"status":"held"}},"NT":{"aboriginal_heritage":{"sources":[],"status":"protected","why":"Sacred sites in the Northern Territory are recorded by the Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority and are not public, by design. The route for a specific property is an Authority Certificate from AAPA, which is also the only answer that carries legal protection."},"acid_sulfate":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"No machine-readable acid sulfate soils layer for the Northern Territory could be found, either among the feature types its spatial service publishes or on its open data portal."},"aircraft_noise":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"There is no national aircraft-noise layer. An ANEF is produced for one airport by that airport's operator, endorsed by Airservices Australia, and published as a chart in the airport's master plan; it reaches GIS only when a council writes it into its planning scheme, one council at a time and at whatever vintage that scheme was last amended. Airservices' own ANEI/ANEF data product is flight-track and noise-monitor time series delivered by email on subscription, not contours and not a service. Brisbane publishes contours for Brisbane and Archerfield airports but attaches a purpose restriction this service cannot meet - see the note under Queensland. No aircraft noise layer is held, so this is not checked anywhere; the Airport Noise section gives the distance to the nearest aerodrome and says that noise and obstacle limitation surfaces were not assessed."},"bushfire":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"No machine-readable bushfire prone area layer for the Northern Territory could be found: not among the 132 feature types its spatial service publishes, and not on its open data portal. Every other state and territory designates bushfire prone land in mapped statewide form. Bushfires NT is the body to ask."},"coastal":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Erosion-prone areas are declared under state coastal legislation and mapped at council level. Answered for New South Wales, Tasmania, Brisbane and Moreton Bay; Victoria has no such overlay at all."},"dual_occ_lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP maps it publish this, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_prohibited":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_restricted":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"flood":{"sources":["nt_flood"],"status":"brokered"},"fsr":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. Other states set floor area differently or do not publish it as a map."},"heritage":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"No machine-readable heritage layer for the Northern Territory could be found: not among the 132 feature types its spatial service publishes, and not on its open data portal, which returns nothing for a heritage register search. The NT Heritage Register is the authority; Heritage NT holds it."},"hob":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure."},"landslide":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by some councils as a planning overlay and by no state uniformly. Answered for Victoria, New South Wales, Tasmania, Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Logan and Moreton Bay."},"lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure; hectare values are shown in square metres."},"school_catchment":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Government school intake zones are published for New South Wales and Victoria and for nowhere else: Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory each run a school-finder tool over boundaries they do not release as data. Non-government schools set their own enrolment areas and publish none of them anywhere."},"tod":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by the Housing SEPP 2021 for New South Wales only."},"wind_region":{"sources":["ga_wind_region"],"status":"held"},"zoning":{"sources":["nt_zoning"],"status":"brokered"}},"QLD":{"aboriginal_heritage":{"sources":[],"status":"protected","why":"Two different things, and neither is a layer this service can answer with. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage database and register records site locations and is not public; searching it for an address is a statutory process, not a map query. What is public is the cultural heritage party boundaries, which say who the Aboriginal party for an area is - a different question from whether a site is present, and the right first contact. Start with the Department of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships."},"acid_sulfate":{"sources":["bne_acid_sulfate","lgn_acid_sulfate","mbrc_acid_sulfate"],"status":"partial","why":"Queensland's state planning policy acid sulfate soil layer is openly licensed and published as a QSpatial catalogue download rather than a service, so this service does not yet hold it. Brisbane, Logan and Moreton Bay are answered from their planning schemes; elsewhere, ask the council or search QSpatial."},"aircraft_noise":{"sources":[],"status":"permission","why":"Brisbane City Council publishes the ANEF contours for Brisbane and Archerfield airports as an open service, marked CC BY 4.0, and the same metadata says the contours are derived from data owned by Brisbane Airport Corporation and that \"its use by any person for purposes not associated with planning and development in Brisbane is not authorised\". A Creative Commons grant and a purpose restriction cannot both be true of the same rows, and a service that answers about any address for any reason cannot satisfy the second. Held back and asked about rather than assumed. No other council in Australia publishes endorsed ANEF contours as open data."},"bushfire":{"sources":["bne_bushfire","gc_bushfire","lgn_bushfire","mbrc_bushfire"],"status":"partial","why":"Queensland's bushfire prone area series is statewide and openly licensed, and it is not published as a service - it is 13 regional files in the QSpatial catalogue, whose download links resolve to a session-based search page. So this is an errand rather than a licence problem, and it is not done. This service answers bushfire for Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Logan and Moreton Bay from their planning schemes."},"coastal":{"sources":["bne_coastal","mbrc_coastal"],"status":"partial","why":"Erosion-prone areas are declared under state coastal legislation and mapped by councils, and Queensland publishes no statewide layer of them. This service answers Brisbane and Moreton Bay. Note that storm tide and sea level rise are different questions from a declared erosion-prone area and are not folded in here."},"dual_occ_lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP maps it publish this, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_prohibited":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_restricted":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"flood":{"sources":["bne_flood_creek","bne_flood_overland","gc_flood","lgn_flood","lgn_flood_risk","mbrc_flood"],"status":"partial","why":"Queensland has no statewide flood planning layer. Flood is a council planning scheme overlay here, and the state's own FloodCheck 1% AEP layer covers 15 towns and maps study extents rather than a planning trigger. This service answers flood for Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Logan and Moreton Bay; elsewhere the council's planning scheme is the source."},"fsr":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. Other states set floor area differently or do not publish it as a map."},"heritage":{"sources":["bne_heritage_local","bne_heritage_state","gc_heritage","lgn_heritage"],"status":"partial","why":"The Queensland Heritage Register is openly licensed and published as a QSpatial catalogue download rather than a service, so this service does not yet hold it. Council heritage overlays are answered for Brisbane, the Gold Coast and Logan. For anywhere else, search the Queensland Heritage Register and the council's planning scheme."},"hob":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure."},"landslide":{"sources":["bne_landslide","gc_landslide","lgn_landslide","mbrc_landslide"],"status":"partial","why":"Landslide is a council planning scheme overlay in Queensland and no state layer maps it. This service answers it for Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Logan and Moreton Bay; elsewhere ask the council."},"lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure; hectare values are shown in square metres."},"school_catchment":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Government school intake zones are published for New South Wales and Victoria and for nowhere else: Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory each run a school-finder tool over boundaries they do not release as data. Non-government schools set their own enrolment areas and publish none of them anywhere."},"tod":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by the Housing SEPP 2021 for New South Wales only."},"wind_region":{"sources":["ga_wind_region"],"status":"held"},"zoning":{"sources":["bne_zoning","gc_zoning","lgn_zoning","mbrc_zoning","scc_zoning","tsv_zoning"],"status":"partial","why":"Queensland has no statewide zoning layer and will not get one - planning schemes are made by each of 77 local governments under the Planning Act 2016. This service holds the six councils that publish openly: Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Moreton Bay, the Sunshine Coast, Logan and Townsville. This address is not in one of them, so its zone has to come from its council's own planning scheme."}},"SA":{"aboriginal_heritage":{"sources":[],"status":"protected","why":"The Register of Aboriginal Sites and Objects is held by the Attorney-General's Department, Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, and is not public: its own notice says the information may be confidential and carries legislative restrictions on release and use. That is a decision to respect rather than work around. Enquiries go to Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation."},"acid_sulfate":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"A construction and excavation constraint on low-lying coastal land. Answered for Victoria, New South Wales, Brisbane, Logan and Moreton Bay."},"aircraft_noise":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"There is no national aircraft-noise layer. An ANEF is produced for one airport by that airport's operator, endorsed by Airservices Australia, and published as a chart in the airport's master plan; it reaches GIS only when a council writes it into its planning scheme, one council at a time and at whatever vintage that scheme was last amended. Airservices' own ANEI/ANEF data product is flight-track and noise-monitor time series delivered by email on subscription, not contours and not a service. Brisbane publishes contours for Brisbane and Archerfield airports but attaches a purpose restriction this service cannot meet - see the note under Queensland. No aircraft noise layer is held, so this is not checked anywhere; the Airport Noise section gives the distance to the nearest aerodrome and says that noise and obstacle limitation surfaces were not assessed."},"bushfire":{"sources":["sa_bushfire"],"status":"brokered"},"coastal":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Erosion-prone areas are declared under state coastal legislation and mapped at council level. Answered for New South Wales, Tasmania, Brisbane and Moreton Bay; Victoria has no such overlay at all."},"dual_occ_lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP maps it publish this, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_prohibited":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_restricted":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"flood":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"South Australia's flood overlay is part of the Planning and Design Code and is openly licensed, so this is not a licence problem. It is published only as a bulk download of every overlay at once - about 870 MB - with no queryable service, so holding it is a batch ingest this service has not done. The SA Planning Portal shows it for any address."},"fsr":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. Other states set floor area differently or do not publish it as a map."},"heritage":{"sources":["sa_heritage"],"status":"brokered"},"hob":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure."},"landslide":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by some councils as a planning overlay and by no state uniformly. Answered for Victoria, New South Wales, Tasmania, Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Logan and Moreton Bay."},"lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure; hectare values are shown in square metres."},"school_catchment":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Government school intake zones are published for New South Wales and Victoria and for nowhere else: Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory each run a school-finder tool over boundaries they do not release as data. Non-government schools set their own enrolment areas and publish none of them anywhere."},"tod":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by the Housing SEPP 2021 for New South Wales only."},"wind_region":{"sources":["ga_wind_region"],"status":"held"},"zoning":{"sources":["sa_zoning"],"status":"brokered"}},"TAS":{"aboriginal_heritage":{"sources":[],"status":"protected","why":"The Tasmanian Aboriginal Heritage Register is not public, by design, to protect sites. A site search for an address is made through Aboriginal Heritage Tasmania."},"acid_sulfate":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"A construction and excavation constraint on low-lying coastal land. Answered for Victoria, New South Wales, Brisbane, Logan and Moreton Bay."},"aircraft_noise":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"There is no national aircraft-noise layer. An ANEF is produced for one airport by that airport's operator, endorsed by Airservices Australia, and published as a chart in the airport's master plan; it reaches GIS only when a council writes it into its planning scheme, one council at a time and at whatever vintage that scheme was last amended. Airservices' own ANEI/ANEF data product is flight-track and noise-monitor time series delivered by email on subscription, not contours and not a service. Brisbane publishes contours for Brisbane and Archerfield airports but attaches a purpose restriction this service cannot meet - see the note under Queensland. No aircraft noise layer is held, so this is not checked anywhere; the Airport Noise section gives the distance to the nearest aerodrome and says that noise and obstacle limitation surfaces were not assessed."},"bushfire":{"sources":["tas_code_overlay"],"status":"brokered"},"coastal":{"sources":["tas_code_overlay"],"status":"brokered"},"dual_occ_lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP maps it publish this, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_prohibited":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_restricted":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"flood":{"sources":["tas_code_overlay"],"status":"brokered"},"fsr":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. Other states set floor area differently or do not publish it as a map."},"heritage":{"sources":["tas_code_overlay","tas_heritage"],"status":"brokered"},"hob":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure."},"landslide":{"sources":["tas_code_overlay"],"status":"brokered"},"lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure; hectare values are shown in square metres."},"school_catchment":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Government school intake zones are published for New South Wales and Victoria and for nowhere else: Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory each run a school-finder tool over boundaries they do not release as data. Non-government schools set their own enrolment areas and publish none of them anywhere."},"tod":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by the Housing SEPP 2021 for New South Wales only."},"wind_region":{"sources":["ga_wind_region"],"status":"held"},"zoning":{"sources":["tas_zoning"],"status":"brokered"}},"VIC":{"aboriginal_heritage":{"sources":["vic_cultural_heritage_sensitivity"],"status":"brokered"},"acid_sulfate":{"sources":["vic_acid_sulfate"],"status":"brokered"},"aircraft_noise":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"There is no national aircraft-noise layer. An ANEF is produced for one airport by that airport's operator, endorsed by Airservices Australia, and published as a chart in the airport's master plan; it reaches GIS only when a council writes it into its planning scheme, one council at a time and at whatever vintage that scheme was last amended. Airservices' own ANEI/ANEF data product is flight-track and noise-monitor time series delivered by email on subscription, not contours and not a service. Brisbane publishes contours for Brisbane and Archerfield airports but attaches a purpose restriction this service cannot meet - see the note under Queensland. No aircraft noise layer is held, so this is not checked anywhere; the Airport Noise section gives the distance to the nearest aerodrome and says that noise and obstacle limitation surfaces were not assessed."},"bushfire":{"sources":["vic_planning_overlays"],"status":"brokered"},"coastal":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"An overlay for coastal hazard does not exist in Victoria's planning schemes: no overlay name in Vicmap Planning mentions the coast, so there is nothing of that kind to load. Flooding is mapped in the Land Subject to Inundation, Floodway and Special Building overlays and erosion in the Erosion Management Overlay; the flood and landslide entries in this report say whether those were checked. Whether a council has mapped coastal inundation or erosion in either is a question for the council or the Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action."},"dual_occ_lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP maps it publish this, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_prohibited":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_restricted":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"flood":{"sources":["vic_planning_overlays"],"status":"brokered"},"fsr":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. Other states set floor area differently or do not publish it as a map."},"heritage":{"sources":["vic_planning_overlays"],"status":"brokered"},"hob":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure."},"landslide":{"sources":["vic_planning_overlays"],"status":"brokered"},"lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure; hectare values are shown in square metres."},"school_catchment":{"sources":["vic_school_catchment"],"status":"held"},"tod":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by the Housing SEPP 2021 for New South Wales only."},"wind_region":{"sources":["ga_wind_region"],"status":"held"},"zoning":{"sources":["vic_zoning"],"status":"held"}},"WA":{"aboriginal_heritage":{"sources":[],"status":"protected","why":"The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register is published, and deliberately coarsened by its custodian: exact locations and extents are withheld and a place is shown as a shaded region of at least four square kilometres. That is the custodian protecting sites, and it also means the layer cannot answer a question about one property - a hit would say only that something lies somewhere in four square kilometres. Use the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage Aboriginal Cultural Heritage enquiry system for an address."},"acid_sulfate":{"sources":[],"status":"permission","why":"The acid sulfate soil risk maps for Western Australia exist and are published on a public server, and their licence does not permit this service to show them to you. Landgate's Locate map at maps.slip.wa.gov.au carries them, free."},"aircraft_noise":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"There is no national aircraft-noise layer. An ANEF is produced for one airport by that airport's operator, endorsed by Airservices Australia, and published as a chart in the airport's master plan; it reaches GIS only when a council writes it into its planning scheme, one council at a time and at whatever vintage that scheme was last amended. Airservices' own ANEI/ANEF data product is flight-track and noise-monitor time series delivered by email on subscription, not contours and not a service. Brisbane publishes contours for Brisbane and Archerfield airports but attaches a purpose restriction this service cannot meet - see the note under Queensland. No aircraft noise layer is held, so this is not checked anywhere; the Airport Noise section gives the distance to the nearest aerodrome and says that noise and obstacle limitation surfaces were not assessed."},"bushfire":{"sources":["wa_bushfire"],"status":"brokered"},"coastal":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Erosion-prone areas are declared under state coastal legislation and mapped at council level. Answered for New South Wales, Tasmania, Brisbane and Moreton Bay; Victoria has no such overlay at all."},"dual_occ_lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP maps it publish this, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_prohibited":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"dual_occ_restricted":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Only councils whose LEP has such a clause publish this map, in New South Wales."},"flood":{"sources":[],"status":"permission","why":"Western Australia's floodplain mapping exists and this service may not show it to you: the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation's licence permits the licensee's own use and not display to anyone else. You can see it yourself for free on the department's floodplain mapping tool at wa.gov.au/service/natural-resources/water-resources/floodplain-mapping-tool, or on Landgate's Locate map."},"fsr":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. Other states set floor area differently or do not publish it as a map."},"heritage":{"sources":[],"status":"permission","why":"The Heritage Council of Western Australia's State Register is published under a licence that does not permit this service to display it to you. inHerit, the Council's own register at inherit.stateheritage.wa.gov.au, is free and searchable by address."},"hob":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure."},"landslide":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by some councils as a planning overlay and by no state uniformly. Answered for Victoria, New South Wales, Tasmania, Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Logan and Moreton Bay."},"lot_size":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Published for every NSW LEP by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure; hectare values are shown in square metres."},"school_catchment":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Government school intake zones are published for New South Wales and Victoria and for nowhere else: Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory each run a school-finder tool over boundaries they do not release as data. Non-government schools set their own enrolment areas and publish none of them anywhere."},"tod":{"sources":[],"status":"absent","why":"Mapped by the Housing SEPP 2021 for New South Wales only."},"wind_region":{"sources":["ga_wind_region"],"status":"held"},"zoning":{"sources":["per_zoning"],"status":"partial","why":"Zoning in Western Australia is a region scheme and a local planning scheme, both published by the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage under a licence that does not permit this service to display them to you. PlanWA, at planning.wa.gov.au/mapping-and-data/planwa, shows both for any address, free. This service can answer zoning for the City of Perth, which publishes its own City Planning Scheme 2 openly."}}},"legend":{"absent":"No such layer published","brokered":"Live from the custodian","held":"Held","not_applicable":"Not a question about land here","partial":"Some councils","permission":"Licence forbids showing it","protected":"Withheld by the custodian to protect sites"},"links":[{"href":"https://openlandfabric.org/coverage","rel":"self","type":"application/json"},{"href":"https://openlandfabric.org/reference","rel":"describedby","title":"Every jurisdiction's licence, with the evidence","type":"application/json"},{"href":"https://openlandfabric.org/report?q=10+Smith+Street+Collingwood+VIC","rel":"related","title":"A report for one property","type":"text/html"}],"note":"Every cell is derived from the register, the licence gate and the same coverage test the service applies to a live request - not written down beside them. Where a layer is missing the reason is given, because the reasons differ and the difference is the only useful thing about a gap: a licence that forbids publication is a letter, an instrument that does not exist is not.","states":[{"code":"NSW","name":"New South Wales"},{"code":"VIC","name":"Victoria"},{"code":"QLD","name":"Queensland"},{"code":"WA","name":"Western Australia"},{"code":"SA","name":"South Australia"},{"code":"TAS","name":"Tasmania"},{"code":"ACT","name":"Australian Capital Territory"},{"code":"NT","name":"Northern Territory"}],"summary":{"absent":77,"blocked_by_licence":4,"cells":{"absent":77,"brokered":29,"held":20,"not_applicable":1,"partial":8,"permission":4,"protected":5},"classes":18,"layer_answer_share":56,"not_applicable":1,"parcel_share":99,"per_state":{"ACT":{"answered":6,"of":17},"NSW":{"answered":17,"of":18},"NT":{"answered":3,"of":18},"QLD":{"answered":8,"of":18},"SA":{"answered":4,"of":18},"TAS":{"answered":7,"of":18},"VIC":{"answered":9,"of":18},"WA":{"answered":3,"of":18}},"protected":5,"states":8},"title":"Coverage"}